Computational Approaches: Drug Discovery and Design in Medicinal Chemistry and Bioinformatics

Abstract

To date, computational approaches have been recognized as a key component in drug design and discovery workflows. Developed to help researchers save time and reduce costs, several computational tools have been developed and implemented in the last twenty years. At present, they are routinely used to identify a therapeutic target, understand ligand–protein and protein–protein interactions, and identify orthosteric and allosteric binding sites, but their primary use remains the identification of hits through ligand-based and structure-based virtual screening and the optimization of lead compounds, followed by the estimation of the binding free energy. The repurposing of an old drug for the treatment of new diseases, helped by in silico tools, has also gained a prominent role in virtual screening campaigns. Moreover, the availability and the decreasing cost of hardware and software, together with the development of several web servers on which to upload and download computational data, have contributed to the success of computer-assisted drug design. These improved, accurate, and reliable methods should help to add new and more potent molecules to the paraphernalia of approved drugs. Nevertheless, the ease of access of computational tools in drug design (software, databases, libraries, and web servers) should not encourage users with little or almost no knowledge of the underlying physical basis of the methods used, who could compromise the interpretation of the results. The figure of the computational (medicinal) chemist should be recognized and included in all research groups. These considerations led us to promote a volume collecting some original contributions regarding all aspects of the computational approaches, such as docking, induced-fit docking, molecular dynamics simulations, free energy calculations, and reverse modeling. We also include ligand-based approaches, such as molecular similarity fingerprints, shape methods, pharmacophore modeling, and QSAR. Drug design and the development process strive to predict the metabolic fate of a drug candidate to establish a relationship between the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and highlight the potential toxicity of the drug candidate. Even though the use of computational approaches is often combined, we tried to identify which of these play a central role in each manuscript. In this Special Issue, the use of molecular dynamics simulations, both unbiased and biased, cover a major part of the contributions. Non-covalent inhibition of the immunoproteasome was investigated in-depth through MD-binding and binding pose metadynamics [1]. MD simulations provided insight into the structural features of hTSPO (Translocator Protein) and the previously unknown interplay between PK11195, a molecule routinely used in positron emission tomography (PET) for the imaging of neuroinflammatory sites, and cholesterol [2]. The interaction of certain endogen substrates, drug substrates, and inhibitors with wild-type MRP4 (WT-MRP4) and its variants G187W and Y556C were studied to determine differences in the intermolecular interactions and affinity related to SNPs using several approaches, but particularly all-atom, coarse-grained, and umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations (AA-MDS and CG-MDS, respectively) [3]. Natural sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were selected to explore their potential against an emerging uropathogenic bacterial therapeutic target, i.e., FimH, which plays a critical role in the colonization of uropathogenic bacteria on the urinary tract surface, and molecular dynamics simulations were carried out to study the potential interactions [4]. Doxorubicin encapsulation in carbon nanotubes with haeckelite or Stone–Wales defects as drug carriers were investigated using a molecular dynamics approach [5]. The combined use of different approaches has been reported in a series of papers associated with t