Intravenous Contrast Material for Cardiac Computed Tomography: Results From the Open-label Multicenter, Multivendor Italian Registry of Contrast Material Use in Cardiac Computed Tomography
- Authors: La Grutta, Ludovico; Maffei, Erica; Clemente, Alberto; Privitera, Giambattista; Rengo, Marco; Seitun, Sara; Malagò, Roberto; Toia, Patrizia; Acquafresca, Manlio; Secchi, Francesco; Gravina, Matteo; Mantini, Cesare; Scardapane, Arnaldo; De Rosa, Roberto; Carusi, Luca Maria; Cossa, Stefano; Falzea, Fabio; Chiappino, Dante; Annoni, Andrea; Francone, Marco; Di Cesare, Ernesto; Midiri, Massimo; Cademartiri, Filippo
- Publication year: 2023
- Type: Articolo in rivista
- OA Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/582460
Abstract
Purpose: The Italian Registry of Contrast Material use in Cardiac Computed Tomography (iRCM-CCT) is a multicenter, multivendor, observational study on the use of contrast media (CM) in patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography (CCT). The aim of iRCM-CCT is to assess image quality and safety profile of intravenous CM compounds. Materials and methods: iRCM-CCT enrolled 1842 consecutive patients undergoing CCT (≥50 per site) at 20 cluster sites with the indication of suspected coronary artery disease. Demographic characteristics, CCT, and CM protocols, clinical indications, safety markers, radiation dose reports, qualitative (ie, poor vascular enhancement) and quantitative (ie, HU attenuation values) image parameters were recorded. A centralized coordinating center collected and assessed all image parameters. Results: The cohort included 891 men and 951 women (age: 63±14 y, body mass index: 26±4 kg/m2) studied with ≥64 detector rows computed tomography scanners and different iodinated intravenous CM protocols and compounds (iodixanol, iopamidol, iohexol, iobitridol, iopromide, and iomeprol). The following vascular attenuation was reported: 504±147 HU in the aorta, 451±146 HU in the right coronary artery, 474±146 HU in the left main, 451±146 HU in the left anterior descending artery, and 441±149 HU in the circumflex artery. In 4% of cases the image quality was not satisfactory due to poor enhancement. The following adverse reactions to CM were recorded: 6 (0.3%) extravasations and 17 (0.9%) reactions (11 mild, 4 moderate, 2 severe). Conclusions: In a multicenter registry on CM use during CCT the prevalence of CM-related adverse reactions was very low. The appropriate use of CM is a major determinant of image quality.