La tutela dei diritti fondamentali tra Costituzione e Carta di Nizza: i nuovi (controversi) spunti della giurisprudenza costituzionale in tema di «doppia pregiudizialità»

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has recently returned to the issue of 'doppia pregiudizialità'. This article attempts to highlight the two directions in which the constitutional jurisprudence has moved. On the one hand, it addresses the question of the possibility of extending the 'concurrence of judicial remedies' to cases of violations of fundamental rights not (exclusively) included in the Nice Charter. On the other hand, the Court provides judges with a vademecum on which remedies to activate and in which order of priority. This article tries to show the reasons why these developments in constitutional jurisprudence are still not straightforward.